Hello to all of you lovelies! As a fan of a wide variety of novels, I enjoy reading books with creative perspectives and different point of views, as well as interesting story lines. A lot of the time, this comes from novels revolving around situations that drive character development. I try to find books with compelling characters, social satire and story evolution.
In say this, I was initially intrigue by the novel "After," written by Anna Todd. I had heard of the YA series a couple of years ago, but hadn't picked up the book until now. Unfortunately, as I was reading the novel I found it extremely difficult to relate to any of the characters-- especially the main character Tessa.
"After" follows the first semester of Tessa's freshman year of college. On the surface, Tessa appears to be a "good-girl." Beginning the year, Tessa has a kind and loyal boyfriend and a committed, albeit overbearing mother, but her world turns upside down when she meets Hardin. As the stereotypical "bad-boy," Hardin displays aggression, angst and turmoil. However, when I was reading the character of Hardin I found him to be an emotionally crueler version of Christian Grey from the series "50 Shades of Grey."
Hardin is manipulative and harsh. He treats the people around him severely and has violent outbursts. Similarly to the "50 Shades of Grey" books, Hardin and Christen both have a traumatic pasts. But unlike Christen Grey, Hardin's emotions don't manifest in S&M, but come out in vicious arguments and possessive demands.
Once Tessa and Hardin start their relationship, the reader is exposed to two different sides of Hardin. As well as, confronted with so many questions about the relationship-- why Hardin behaves the way he does and why Tessa trusts Hardin so much, so quickly and why Hardin is extremely possessive of Tessa. Especially, after observing how tumultuous the relationship is between Tessa and Hardin, the reader is constantly questioning Hardin's motives.
Furthermore, "After's" main plot had very little depth and was surrounded around superficial relationships. I also found Tessa's character to be frustrating and kindof annoying, she had little to no self-respect and allowed people to manipulate and take advantage of her. Hardin on the other hand is cocky, overtly possessive and controlling. I found that "After" displayed a poor depiction of women, as well as a negative and unhealthy view of relationships.
As I was reading the novel, I kept drawing comparisons between two narratives: "50 Shades of Grey" and the early 2000's teen movie "She's All That." And as "After" came to a conclusion, I believe my comparisons were spot-on. The climax of the relationship between Hardin and Tessa, reveled that it was basically all a lie. It was based off of a cruel, manipulative bet Hardin had made with his friends to take Tessa's virginity.
Though, I know my opinion may not be the popular one. "After" does have an elaborate and extensive fan base, I didn't really enjoy the book and I probably won't read the rest of the series. I found the characters to be impossible to relate to and I could wrap my mind around the idea of Tessa actually dating Hardin. He belittled her, made fun of her, was cruel to her, showed no remorse of his actions and repeatedly lied her. And that was before they started dating. As someone who has dated guys throughout high school, college and post college, I could not comprehend entering into a relationship with that behaved that way. I don't find this type of story romantic or find the character redeemable. I think this story displays overtly sexual scenes that are demeaning to women and a negative view for young women to "aspire" to.
What do you think? Have you read the book "After" or the other books in the series? If so, how do you think of the story or how the story evolves? Do you think I'm wrong and should give the "After" series a second chance? Let me know, I'd love to hear your thoughts!
For now, I say good night and hope that the my random ramblings have peeked your inner bookworm.
~BL
Hello to all of you lovelies! I'm a bit behind on posting this month. I have already read/listened to a few books, and I am incredibly excited to share my thoughts with you all. But more than that, I'm eager to hear from all of you. Although, many of the books I have written reviews on have been categorized as "YA" or "Young Adult," I don't believe that should hinder anyone from enjoying a good story. As I have stated in the past I am a sucker for a enticing tale-- whether that is a novel written for young adults or adults. A biography written on someone I find interesting or admire, or even a fable-- navigating the journey of one of my favorite heroes/heroines.
The fact is, that I enjoy the act of reading, I enjoy learning and I enjoy taking lessons away from a good book. I believe, reading opens the mind. It gives new perspectives, it allows the audience to escape and travel between space and time, but most importantly it is a way to venture outside of yourself and exceed your own expectations.
So, I hope you all continue to read. But more than that I hope to hear from you. I'd love to hear what you think. What characters you believe are redeemable, evil/good or even what characters you relate to the most. I'm also always looking for good books to read, so if you have any recommendations let me know in the comment section.
Now that all of the housekeeping has been taken care of, let's get to the good stuff.
The book I'm going to review is a sequel to one of my favorite stories. It is also I book that I picked up a while ago but just now gotten around to reading it-- and I am kicking myself. "Where She Went," by Gayle Forman, is the sequel to the novel "If I Stay."
If you are unfamiliar with book "If I Stay," it revolves around a young girl named Mia Hall and a devastating car accident, which killed her family and forced her "spirit" to decide whether to live or die. "Where She Went," picks up three years after Mia's car accident. But this time around, the story is told through Mia's high school boyfriend, Adam's point of view.
Adam's story from the outside world-- is one that most people would do anything to have. His dream of making it as a musician came true. He is officially a "rock-star." His band "Shooting Star" is chart topping, with world tours, platinum albums and record breaking sales. But not just that-- he has the bank account of a "rock-star," the girlfriend of a "rock-star" and the habits of a "rock-star." And yet, Adam remains haunted by his past.
After the death of the Hall family and loosing Mia because of time, distance and heartbreak, Adam becomes anxious and distant from the people around him-- including his family and friends, "Where She Went," follows Adam's journey as he begins to pull his life back together and as he starts to make choices that mend his mind and heart.
"Where She Went," bounces between the book's present and Adam's memories. Memories of Mia, memories of the early days of "Shooting Star" and memories of his love of music. The book's present begins with a reunion between Mia and Adam. On a day, which causes Adam significant torment he finds his way to Mia. Who is preforming the debut of her life at Carnegie Hall. It is the beginning of her classical, cello career and the beginning of the life she has worked the last three years to achieve. After a brief meeting in Mia's dressing room, Adam's anxiety takes hold and he leaves abruptly. He believed that it was a sign and that meeting Mia again would provide a sense of peace. But peace did not come. Instead, Mia tracked him down and persuaded him to rediscover her city. As they explore the city that has become Mia's home, Adam and Mia revisit the past and open their hearts to the future and each other.
When Adam and Mia see each other again, their spark is reignited and they begin to divulge their secrets, their fears and their desires for the future. Their confessions help to rebuild their bond and they realize that the love they once shared still exists.
Their bond is almost palpable and is one of my favorite aspects of the book. Gayle Forman's writing is incredibly vivid and the description of their past and present supports the idea that these characters remained devoted to one another. Though they have both suffered, they understand that their love of music and of one another will heal them. "Where She Went" is the a book love, closure and acceptance.
"Mia's smile is melting chocolate. It's a kick-ass guitar solo. It's everything good in the world."
What do you think? Have you read the book "If I Stay," or "Where She Went"? If so, how do you think the sequel compares? Let me know, I'd love to hear your thoughts!
For now, I say good night and hope that the my random ramblings have peeked your inner bookworm.
~BL
Hello to all of you lovelies! Every year, the literary community gathers together for a must anticipated event-- BookCon. BookCon is an annual fan convention, which was established in New York back in 2014. Taking its name format from other fan conventions (ie Comic-Con), BookCon combines contemporary pop culture and the book industry.
Personally, I have been looking forward to BookCon for over a year. Now with the only a few weeks left before the big day-- May 14, 2016-- I cannot wait to see what is in store this year. Each year there are panels and Q&As with some of most beloved authors, comedians, celebrities and content creators. In addition to a Show Floor with the most influential publishers in the world and autograph sessions.
This year, there is over a dozen wonderful and creative guests that will be presenting and offering insight into their creative processes. For someone like me, who has been an avid reader since childhood and is an aspiring writer, BookCon's immersive experience is the ultimate celebration of the literary world. It allows an interactive, educational and creative outlet for all of my fellow book-nerds out there (don't worry, I say that with love). To be honest, I don't know what or who I'm most looking forward to-- there are too many wonderful authors and creators attending this year's event for me to choose from, but I will say that Pierce Brown, Scott Sigler, Susan Dennard, Cassandra Clare, Michael DiMartino and fellow Chicagoan Veronica Roth are definitely at the top of my list.
I am hoping to attend as many panels and Q&As as possible, as well as hear about up coming projects some of my favorite authors/creators will be apart of in the future. If you are in the Chicago area, I highly recommend checking out BookCon this year. For more information go to: http://www.thebookcon.com.
For now, I say good night and hope that the my random ramblings have peeked your inner bookworm.
~BL
Hello to all of you lovelies! Here today, I have my latest review. I'm incredibly excited to share my thoughts on the most recent book I have completed. "Lady Midnight," is the first book of the Dark Artifices series from author Cassandra Clare.
The Dark Artifices series, continues the adventures of the Shadowhunter world and connects The Mortal Instruments series and The Infernal Devices trilogy with overlapping characters and plot twits. Now, this is one of my favorite aspects of Clare's writing--especially within the Shadowhunter world-- she is able to intertwine plots from multiple locations, times throughout history and character connections.
However before I dive in, I want to disclose that I have read both of Cassandra Clare's previous series-- which is pretty important. For those of you that have not read The Mortal Instruments series and/or The Infernal Devices trilogy, you will be EXTREMELY confused jumping into this book. The other two series are quite extensive and gives important background details into the Shadowhunter world--which vital to have in order to understand "Lady Midnight." In The Mortal Instruments series and The Infernal Devices trilogy the characters explain the rules of this world, the types of obstacles Shadowhunters face and both series set up the plot for The Dark Artifices. Without having that background information, "Lady Midnight" would be almost impossible to understand, especially since characters from both series make appearances in "Lady Midnight" and Clare's newest series stems from the aftermath of The Mortal Instruments series.That being said, The Dark Artifices has already established it's own identity among the other Shadowhunter novels.
It is set in present day LA and follows Emma Carstairs. The latest, in a long line of Shadowhunters. Emma is not only a warrior, but she is one of the best (arguably the best of her generation) and she is the heroin we are supporting. Emma is a unique type of character, because she only truly had two motivations in life. 1.) To find out the truth about how her parents' died and 2.) her parabatai: Julian Blackthorn (basically the most important person in the world to her).
Emma's story picks up, several years after the epic battle in Idris, known as the "Dark War." "The Dark War" concludes The Mortal Instruments series and begins the set-up for The Dark Artifices.
"The Dark War" was fought against Sebastian Morgenstern. This battle killed off the majority of the Shadowhunter community and resulted in the Cold Peace (a term used to refer to the harsh fallout of the treaty signed between Shadowhunters and the faeries of the Seelie Court). The Cold Peace unified the Shadowhunters, Vampires, Witches/Warlocks and Werewolves against the Seelie and Unseelie Courts. This treaty unified many (previously) warring communities, however it also divided families and friends. Anyone within these factions--specifically the Shadowhunters-- that had "faerie blood" were exiled. This very act, separated the Blackthorn family even further. Julian's parents were killed during the "Dark War," and now Julian's older sister-- Helen and older brother-- Mark were taken away from the rest of their family. Leaving a twelve year old Julian in charge of and responsible for his four younger siblings.
However, when were are re-introduced to the Blackthorn family--it is present day and they are all older. Emma and Julian are tasked with patrols and though Emma is eager for battle, where Emma goes Julian is not far behind. And on a night like any other, Emma comes across a case that is eerily similar to one she holds most dear--the death of her parents. When the bodies of humans and faeries turn up murdered the same way Emma's parents were discovered, a secret and hesitant alliance is formed between Emma and the Blackthorns and the faeries.
Emma sees this as an opportunity to discover the truth behind her parents' murders and Julian has the opportunity to have his brother, Mark back-- who was being held by the faeries and was forced to become a member of the Wild Hunt.
"Lady Midnight," takes the concepts that readers have come to know and understand from Clare's previous works, but adds in new twists and turns. I really enjoyed the deep emotion and humor that seemed effortless between the characters and personally I could feel the paternal devotion Julian had for his younger siblings. I also really appreciated the intermingling of past events, which helped shape the arch of the story.
Although, I really did enjoy the dynamic between all of the characters, the Emma and Julian story line frustrated me--especially in the end. I didn't like that Emma, lied to Julian and decided to "pretend" to be in a relationship with Mark-- because I feel like that goes against the fundamentals of the parabatai bond. The parabatai connection binds two people together on a spiritual and emotional level. Furthermore, Emma and Julian's bond is stronger than most to the point where Julian literally almost drowned in his studio because Emma was trapped in the ocean, so I feel like Julian should be able to tell the Emma is lying. I also think, that once Emma discovered the truth about the parabatai bond she should have told Julian. She is now causing a deeper rift in an already unstable relationship, between Julian and Mark.
But I really enjoyed the connection that was forming between Mark and Christina (a close friend of Emma's, who is doing her "travel year" in LA, but she is originally from Mexico). In general, I really enjoyed Christina's character-- she reminded me a little of Izzy from the The Mortal Instruments-- in the sense that they are both fiercely protective over the ones they care about and they are strong warriors that never back down from a challenge. I also, liked Mark's character a lot. He provided a great deal of comedic relief and also provided a lot of insight and knowledge about the faeries.
Now, that I've completed "Lady Midnight" I can honestly say that I enjoyed the book-- even with the frustrating parts--predictable "love-triangle" and the lack of adult support, in addition to the possible inconsistencies with plot points (parabatai connection-- how it works, why is Emma's and Julian's connection strong enough to create a "super parabatai" bond, where if one dies so does the other, but not strong enough to detect when one of them is lying).
However, if I am being honest I would also have to say I didn't enjoy "Lady Midnight" as much as I enjoyed some of Clare's other novels. Out of all of her series (so far) I would say that The Infernal Devices trilogy is my favorite and from collection, "Clockwork Princess" would be my top choice.
"I don't know... But I know Tessa. She's his-- well, girlfriend seems not the right word for it. They've known each other a long time. I have a feeling they're both watching over you."
Yet, I am excited to read what happens next in The Dark Artifices and where the story will pick up. What do you think? Have you read the book? How do you think it compares to Cassandra Clare's other series (so far)? Are you also hoping to see more of Jem and Tessa/ Jace and Clary? What do you think about the cliffhanger about the "lost Herondale"? Does that make Jace and Tessa related to him? I can't wait to see how Tessa and Jem fit into the next part of the story. What about you? Let me know, I'd love to hear your thoughts!
For now, I say good night and hope that the my random ramblings have peeked your inner bookworm.
~BL
Hello to all of you lovelies! So I'm a little behind, but it took me a little longer to finish my most recent book (longer than anticipated). However because I am a annoyed with myself for missing an entry, I'm going to double up this week.
I have recently finished "The Girl You Left Behind," written by Jojo Moyes. Now for those who have read her other works, "The Girl You Left Behind" follows a similar emotional roller coaster. The reader follows the lives to two young women, separated by time and space--nearly a hundred years-- but connected by their determination to fight and survive.
We begin in 1916, in the midst of a German, occupied France during World War I. We are introduced to Sophie Lefevre, the wife French artist Edouard Lefevre, who is also the matriarch of her family (although she is the second oldest). While the war is progressing, Sophie's small town falls into German hands and Sophie and her sister are forced to feed and serve the German soldiers that occupy her town. The soldiers strip the town and the hotel that Sophie's family owns, of all of their comforts--everything from art and literature to furniture and blankets are taken from their rightful owners. While Sophie struggles to feed and keep her family healthy, she slowly earns the unwelcome attention of the local Kommandant--or really a portrait of Sophie does. The Kommandant becomes memorized by the painting done by Edouard Lefevre. But this attention, will force Sophie to risk everything she holds dear--her family, her reputation, her husband and her life. Yet, she is willing to give up everything if it means she can see her husband one last time, and she
does.
A hundred years later, the portrait of Sophie Lefevre is still captivating people. One in particular is a young woman named Liv Halston. The portrait is given to Liv by her late husband, as a wedding gift. And after the crushing death of Liv's husband, there are few things that actually bring joy to her life--the portrait is one of those items. It conjures up memories of their honeymoon, moments they shared together and most importantly it reminds Liv of the loved they shared. But now it's been four years since Liv's husband past away, and she finds herself in a completely different life situation than she ever thought possible. Her once secluded and reserved life, has morphed into one full of chaos and unpredictability.
After four years of denying affection, Liv randomly meets Paul-- an ex- New York detective that now hunts down lost/stole artifacts and returns them to the legal owners. And as if over night, Liv and Paul find a camaraderie with one another, which blossoms into something more. Unfortunately the closer Liv and Paul become, the more trouble falls in their wake. After spending the night together, Paul sees the Sophie's portrait titled "The Girl You Left Behind," for the first time-- but it just so happens to be the latest case Paul is working on. It is his job to procure the portrait and return it to the Lefevre family.
This chance encounter reveals the painting's true origins and it's financial worth (which is substantial). And soon a battle begins between Liv and the Lefevre family, putting Paul directly in the middle and in the line of fire. He was hired to get the portrait back, but he has come to realize how important and meaningful the painting is to Liv, and Liv has become exceptionally meaningful to Paul.
Liv on the other hand is putting herself into financial ruin, in order to keep the painting. Legal fees and discovering/ legitimizing the painting's province is a costly endeavor, not to mention Liv was already broke before the case began. However the struggle to find out who is the legitimate owner is, testing Liv's beliefs on what is right and what is wrong. Sophie's portrait has a dark, passionate history-- filled with sacrifice and lose, which only makes Liv want to keep it more. Liv loves the portrait for what it represents and it's unique beauty. The financial worth means very little to her.
But the fact that Paul is on the opposing side, the side trying to take one of the last remaining pieces of her marriage away-- she finds it difficult to trust him. Even though, Paul is an honorable man with no alternative agenda, other than just wanting Liv to be happy and secure.
As I was reading, I found myself becoming quite annoyed with Liv. As I have said before, in real-life I am incredibly rational and I find it difficult to relate to characters that do not have "flight" response. I believe it is a part of our human DNA to have an element of self-preservation, but Liv was willing loose her home, loose all of her money and security to fight a battle that she would have historically lost. If it wasn't for Paul (of all people) who sacrificed his career and looked for hidden clues, Liv would have lost everything. However the romantic in me, loves the idea of sacrificing for love and art.
Also, "The Girl You Left Behind" toggles between several different points of view. We are given Liv's, Sophie's and Paul's perspective-- which gives the audience more insight into the "behind the scenes" story, as opposed to what each character reveals to other people. And I believe that might be one of the reasons I became so annoyed with Liv-- because we the readers, knew Paul was an upstanding man, with the purest intentions-- who was put in an impossible position, however Liv did not always acknowledge Paul's character.
Though Liv's storyline was the primary focus, I found myself drawn to Sophie's life more. I found Sophie's life path was incredibly three- dimensional, vivid and full of emotion. I could feel her struggles and I was routing for her survival, while Liv's world felt empty. Her friendships and relationships seemed forced, and aspects in her life seemed like they were added in just to create more (unnecessary drama)-- for example Liv's father was not "all there," and his wife kept leaving him, which made Liv be the voice of reason to her father's emotional troubles. Also Moyes did such a beautiful job crafting the relationship between Sophie and Edouard, and Sophie and her sister, but I felt that the contemporary relationships lacked some tangible qualities.
"Just for carrying on really. Sometimes, my darling girl, that's heroic in itself."
Overall I would recommend this novel. However, I do feel like you need to be in the right mind-set to really enjoy the journey. At times it is incredibly sad, other times I felt myself cringe because the details were so clear, I could picture the events unfolding right in front of my eyes. But it is not all doom and gloom, there are moments that were slightly more light-hearted. Because "The Girl You Left Behind" is not what I would call a "happy" novel, I do think it is important to be prepared for some violence, some graphic descriptions and definitely some tears.
What do you think? Have you read the book? How would you react to the discovery of stolen art? Would you have gone to court over a painting? Let me know, I'd love to hear your thoughts!
For now, I say good night and hope that the my random ramblings have peeked your inner bookworm.
~BL
Hello to all of you lovelies! Welcome to March! I'm really excited to discuss the latest book I've read "Me Before You," written by Jojo Moyes. This novel is full of humor and emotion. "Me Before You," tells the story of two individuals with dramatically different pasts, but because of external and random moments, their lives become intertwined. Lou (Louisa) Clark is quarky, creative and clever-- a little unconventional and definitely the type of person to do whatever it takes to help out those she loves. Will Traynor, is a successful, wealthy, adventurous and smart man. He is also a man who lost the portion of his life, which he appreciates the most. Three years ago, Will suffered from a debilitating motorcycle accident, rendering him as a quadriplegic.
After his loss, Will was forced to relinquish romance, career aspirations and most of all, control of his life. Before Lou, Will knows his accident took away his desire to live. He knows everything feels rather small, joyless and he has lost the desire to even wake up in the morning. After a few attempts to end his own life, Will's parents hire Lou to be his caregiver.
Lou too, knows a lot. She knows her life was mundane, predictable and a bit of a struggle. Everyday she wakes up in the same room she has for years, goes to work all day in order to help provide for her family and expects to live an ordinary life. She knows she enjoyed her former job at The Buttered Bun Tea Shop and she also knows that she no longer has anything in common with her boyfriend-- and may not love him anymore. However there are things Lou doesn't know.
Unbeknownst to Lou, she was hire not only to be a caregiver and companion to Will, she was also hired to give Will a reason to live. Will's parents wanted Lou, to be a breath of fresh air for him. To give him a reason to wake up each day, instead of throwing in the towel. Over the course of their relationship, Lou and Will go from mutual disdain to a deep affection for one another. Lou brings Will out of his shell of pain and sorrow, while Will gives Lou the courage to actually live her life.
I found myself connecting deeply to Lou's character. Though she and I have different objectives, her personality is something I can relate to. I like to believe, I share some of Lou's qualities-- and if I haven''t already I'd like the opportunity to explore Lou's range of emotions. I also related a lot to Will's character, in the sense that I believe we have the right to make decisions for ourselves and no one has the right to take that away from us.
As I was reading, I found the arch of their relationship to be profoundly powerful. It made me rethink how even the smallest events in our lives, have the ability to shape the person we are, and the person we become. "Me Before You," also gave a new perspective on the choices people face. Though we all have problems in our lives, we also have the ability to control our own destiny and to change our mind; to make different choices or decisions-- we just need the courage or determination to do so. This was one of my favorite aspects of the novel, Moyes was able to intertwine so much longing and joy with overwhelming sadness and despair. I found myself crying uncontrollably one moment and laughing the next.
I loved how Will and Lou's relationship didn't start off well, but blossomed into this truly wonderful story. As I read, I could feel the struggle Lou felt, trying to figure out a way to connect to Will, without forcing him to become her friend. But at the same time, you could sense Will's resistance in allowing Lou in. It was a constant give and take with their relationship-- Lou provided Will with joy and laughter, and small adventures that gave him some escape from his health issues. While Will challenged Lou intellectually, helped her face her fears and provided comfort and forgiveness where no one else did. Will also inspired Lou to believe in herself and live her life fully.
I believe the turning point of Will and Lou's relationship happened when Will allowed Lou to shave and cut his hair. It was such a small act, but it was a scene full of intimacy and emotion. This broke down Will's walls and it gave Lou a glimpse into the man he once was. But I believe it was after Lou's birthday dinner that their relationship really came into fruition. Will came as a support system and as a friend and Lou was attempting to show Will, how enjoyable a normal evening out could be. Though to the surrounding guests, their friendship was odd (Lou was literally helping Will eat and drink--feeding him and lifting his glass to his lips), to them it was as natural as breathing. But to the others, it was awkward and far to intimate.
However, it was Will's gift that really made the night memorable. Will's gift was modest-- a pair of bumble- bee tights. But it was a gift that gave Lou real joy-- as a child Lou had a pair of tights exactly like them and they were one of her favorite belongings. Now in comparison, Patrick, Lou's boyfriend gave her a necklace. Something gold and flashy-- nothing that Lou would select or wear for herself. And in that moment, I realized (even if Lou hadn't yet) that Patrick didn't really know her and Lou didn't really love Patrick. It was Will that listened to her childhood story, it was Will who respected her unique fashion sense and it was Will who put time and thought into a memorable gift.
"You only get one life. It's actually your duty to live it as fully as possible."
But I think the moment, both Will and Lou really fell for one another was at Will's ex-girlfriend's wedding. They both recognized there was something more to their relationship. And though the next few chapters were filled with many ups and downs. It was a night where they were both truly happy.
There were so many amazing moments throughout the book, which really lended to the growth of these two individuals. And even though, the book ended with me in tears, I couldn't imagine a better way to conclude this story. Or at least this portion of the story. It broke my heart when I read Will and Lou's goodbye scene, but it was true to the characters--which is one thing I really enjoyed about Moyes writing. She defined each character's personality so clearly that it allowed their interactions and relationships to be unique, but she also provided each character with the potential for growth.
"Me Before You," was more than just another romance. It spoke of family issues, unemployment, education, love, living life to the fullest and aid with dying. This novel had so many different layers that classifying it as strictly a romance, is limiting and doesn't do the content justice. I am looking forward to reading the sequel "After You," which continues the story. I am hoping to see Lou mature even further and to take Will's advice, love and support with her as she continues to grow.
"Don't think of me too often. I don't want to think of you getting all maudlin. Just live well. Just live. Love, Will"
What do you think? Have you read the book? Do you plan to read the second novel? If so, what are you looking forward to seeing? Let me know, I'd love to hear your thoughts!
For now, I say good night and hope that the my random ramblings have peeked your inner bookworm.
~BL
Hello to all of you lovelies! As I had said (wrote) in my last post, I was excited to read "The Choice" by Nicholas Sparks for a few reasons-- the first was because, I enjoy the "real-life" qualities Sparks attributes to his characters and the second was because I heard there was a film adaptation being made and I wanted to compare the two.
Now that I have finished the novel, I couldn't wait to see how these characters (that I had fallen in love with) come to life. As in many film adaptations, there were certain aspects that had changed from the novel, however I will say that I was pleasantly surprised that at it's core, the film stayed pretty true to the novel. Though the film did take a great deal of creative liberties with the story,
But first things first, the cast. As I have said in the past, when I read, I visualize the characters in great detail and when I see a film version of the story, I find it difficult (at times) to separate my version of the character. So when the actor differs, I can become frustrated. However, I am more forgiven of the physical appearance if the personal matches. And this was the case with "The Choice."
Travis (Parker, from the novel--they changed his name) Shaw, played by Benjamin Walker, actually fits both the physical and personality I envisioned, while I was reading. Travis from the novel, was easy-going, laid back and was in no rush to find himself in a committed relationship. From my perspective, I would say Benjamin Walker portrayed Travis really well.
Gabby Holland, on the other hand was very different then what I pictured. Gabby from the novel, had fair skin with freckles and red hair. The Gabby from the film, played by Teresa Palmer, is petite, tan and blonde. Though, Teresa Palmer did a good job portraying the character, both her physical appearance and demeanor where different than what I had expected. In my mind I pictured a more reserved, Emma Stone.
Another character that I had truly enjoyed reading was Travis' sister, Steph. I loved how snarky, smart, witty and insightful Steph was in the novel. While I was reading, you could sense how close and devoted Travis and Steph were to one another. Though the film version was a toned down version, Maggie Grace did a good job embodying the sisterly role. There was a great deal of playful chemistry between Maggie Grace and Benjamin Walker, which made their on screen sibling relationship, believable and three dimensional. However, I think my favorite character from the film was Shep (Travis' father), played by Tom Wilkinson. Shep was warm, funny, father figure. However, like Gabby's character, Shep was a bit different from the book to the film. For starters, Shep was a widower, a very religious man (in fact he is a Pastor) and is a man trying to find romantic love again. The novel version, was less developed and we didn't have much backstory, aside from knowing he was a veterinarian that worked with Travis. But I did in fact I enjoy giving Shep a more profound role.
Other differences, Gabby is a medical student and not a PA and her (ex)boyfriend Ryan is a doctor at the hospital and not an insurance agent. Gabby's parents were different as well. Both her mother and father work for a well- off family as the doorman/butler and the personal chef, instead of a "southern belle" and her stereotypical, golf-loving father. Furthermore, Gabby is an only child in the film, which differs from the book where she had two sisters. I feel that these changes altered Gabby's film personality. Especially the portrayal of Gabby's parents. The relationship Sparks depicted allowed us readers to make certain assumptions. The Gabby from the novel, had a strained relationship with her "southern-belle" mother--mostly because Gabby saw herself as more of a brainy-ac instead of a beauty queen. The Gabby from the novel was self- conscious, soft spoken and at times leaned on Travis when conflict arose. The film version lacked that vulnerability.
The differences between Travis were slightly more subtle. The main one was the aspect that Travis was more of "player" in the film. The novel version of Travis alluded to the fact that he never lacked company, but the film put it all out there.
Another difference, the dogs. From the book, Gabby had a purebred collie and Travis' dog was a boxer. In the film both dogs were different (still adorable though).
Now, that I have read "The Choice" and seen the film adaptation. I will say that I enjoyed the novel a bit more. The film was a good romantic film. And if I hadn't read the novel, I probably would have enjoyed the film more. But my biggest issue with the movie were all the changes. I felt that the differences took away from point of the story arch and were unnecessary to--like changing Travis' last name... why?
However, I do believe both are worthy of your time. The story itself is filled with love, humor and some sarcasm-- my favorite qualities and I enjoyed the emotional ride they each provided. I can respect each adaptation of the story as an individual project, but I would recommend reading the book first.
What do you think? Have you read the book and/or seen the movie? Were you hoping to see a specific scene come to life in the film? Let me know, I'd love to hear your thoughts!
For now, I say good night and hope that the my random ramblings have peeked your inner bookworm.
~BL
Hello to all of you lovelies! I'm sorry I'm a bit late, but I'm excited to write this new review. So, this week I have my second February book review on "The Choice," by Nicholas Sparks. Now, many people believe that Nicholas Sparks novels cater to the sentimental reader (aka sappy love stories), and you know what, even if I believed that to be true, I don't see anything wrong with it.
I honestly think that there is nothing wrong with fairy tales, everyone ends up "happily ever after"-- and who wouldn't want that. But I also feel that Nicholas Sparks' novels aren't given the credit they deserve. I will agree, that many of the plots can be predictable, yet there is element of surprise intertwined in every story Nicholas Sparks has written.
Now in real-life, I am usually "a glass half empty" kindof gal-- I tend to be a bit too rational for my own good. But when I'm reading, I am a hopeless romantic. I want good to triumph over evil, I want the hero to defeat the villains and I want love to conquer all. Going along with that idea, when I read a Nicholas Sparks novel-- I go in anticipating some drama. Whether it is a love triangle, life- threatening disease, a war or an insane ex set out for revenge. But these extreme aspects make the simple moments more powerful. I also, enjoy Nicholas Sparks novels because he writes about actual people. Not superheroes or immortal beings, but about people you could meet on the street. Flawed individuals, with real-life decisions. And I think this is one of the reasons, Nicholas Sparks novels are so popular-- because the characters are relateable.
Though Nicholas Sparks is notorious for having us readers become incredibly invested in the characters' lives, just to throw us a curve ball (usually a life altering curve ball), "The Choice" is no different. I mean it's basically spelled out in the title.
To be honest, I haven't gotten around to reading this book until now (there are just so many books to read, and so little time to read them all). But when I found out, there was going to be a film adaptation made-- I dove right in. I admittedly, tend to be critical of film adaptations if I read the novel first, however if I see the movie and then read the book, I have a difficult time separating the actors from the characters. So, for "The Choice" I wanted to first read the book and then see the movie (because lets be honest, I'm a sucker for an epic love story).
"The Choice," is told from two different time periods. We learn the about the main characters, Travis Parker and Gabby Holland through flashbacks. We see their relationship evolve from hostel neighbors, to reluctant friends and beyond. When we first meet Travis, he has his life figured out. He is a veterinarian, confident and has everything he could ever want. When we meet Gabby, on the outside she seems to have her life together, but inside she is racked with insecurities and doubts--everything from career indecision to relationship fears. But when the two meet, their differences make one another better. Travis allows Gabby to flourish, while Gabby gives Travis purpose.
At first, I thought "The Choice" was going to be another love triangle story. One woman torn between two men, but the story unfolded in a different way. The chemistry between Travis and Gabby, which lead to love, was undeniable. They brought the best out of each other, without trying to alter one others' core personality. Their relationship evolved quickly but it was a natural progression-- I did feel that the speed in which they "fell in love" was rapid. However, the way Sparks wrote their relationship, made it seem as if they had known one another longer. It did help that Sparks established a friendship first (for a time) before jumping into a romantic relationship.
The story continues through Travis and Gabby's life together-- building a home together, getting married and even having children. These portions of the novel, were told through flashbacks, but we were given "current" time told through Travis point of view.
But when tragedy strikes, Travis' world is turned upside down. After a serious car accident, Gabby remains in a coma. Month after month, Gabby's condition does not improve and Travis is left with an impossible decision. He literally has Gabby's life in his hands.
"Every path you take, leads you to another choice."
"The Choice," continues to give us insight into the depth of love Travis has for Gabby and vice versa. Their relationship is pure and intense romantic love-- filled with trust, strength and the choices they (we) make to overcome the barriers life has, in order to be with the ones they (we) love. Now I don't want to give away the ending, but I will say I laughed and I cried throughout the story. But more importantly I envied the love between Travis and Gabby.
As you can probably tell, I really enjoyed "The Choice." It made me think about the choices I make throughout my day and the decisions that have shaped the person I am.
I am looking forward to seeing the movie and comparing the two.
What do you think? How far would you go for the person you love? What are you hoping to see in the film? Let me know, I'd love to hear your thoughts!
For now, I say good night and hope that the my random ramblings have peeked your inner bookworm.
~BL
Hello to all of you lovelies! So, this week I have my first February book review on, "Passenger," written by Alexandra Bracken.
"Passenger" follows Henrietta "Etta" Spencer, a 17 year old, violin prodigy as she discovers the real story behind, her family's lineage. When I first heard of "Passenger" I was excited to read it; I found the concept of a time travelling, treasure hunt, to be incredibly fascinating. Especially, after reading and loving the "Ruby Red" trilogy, written by Kerstin Gier. I was looking forward to going on new and different adventures, and following Etta as she discovered her true destiny.
In saying that, Bracken's time- travelling world has many different levels, so I want to begin with a break-down of the world Bracken created. There are specific "rules" to time travel, and as Etta learns the rules, we as readers learn them. This type of story-telling reminded me a little, to how J.K. Rowling told "Harry Potter," in the sense that as Harry learned, we the readers, learned. However, unlike in "Harry Potter," Etta does not have people willing to help and explain the rules to her initially. Instead she is thrust into this bizarre and confusion world, with no guidance or explanation. She is just expected to adapt and move forward, which surprisingly she is able to do (to some extent).
As we begin piecing together the "rules" of time travel--we learn that the passages used for travelling, not only move a person through time, but also through space. For example, we begin the story in modern day New York, but the first passage Etta travels through, brings her to the Atlantic Ocean on a pirate ship in the year 1776. We learn that the passages are connected to one specific year and location, and if you wish to travel back to the day you left, the traveler must wait an entire year in order to return (ie: if a traveler leaves September 1st and wants to return home on that day, they have to live in the decade/century they traveled to, until it is September 1st again).
"The best way to explain this is to think of the timeline as a kind of... constant, roaring stream. It's path is set, but we create ripples by jumping in and out. Time corrects itself the best it can to keep later events consistent. But if a small change snowballs into a much larger one, or it a traveler's actions are devastating enough it can actually shift the flow of the timeline, thereby changing the shape of the future from that point on."
We also, discover that time travelling is limited to those who have inherited the gene from their families. Throughout history there have only been four families to travel through time. But over the years--after civil wars, power struggles and rebellions, there is now only one surviving family-- the Ironwood family. Except we find out that Etta and her mother are the sole survivors of a rival family, the Lindens. Which brings us to the real reason Etta begins to travel. Cyrus Ironwood the patriarch of the Ironwood family kidnaps Etta and her mother, Rose. Cyrus Ironwood then threaten's Rose's life and forces Etta to travel to find the last existing astrolabe, a device that aids in time-travel (however we find out later that the astrolabe is actually significantly more powerful then we were first lead to believe).
This creates obstacles for the "Passenger" characters, especially when Rose, leaves clues for Etta throughout history to follow. Bringing Etta to London 1940, Paris 1880 and Bhutan 1910. Fortunately, Etta is aided in her travels by the charming and chivalrous sailor/pirate Nicholas Carter. Who we met on board the Challenger, the pirate ship in 1776.
Nicholas is bribed into helping Etta at first, by Cyrus Ironwood, but eventually forfeits his fortune because of his feelings for Etta.
I've enjoyed the path that "Passenger" has taken so far, but there are aspects of the story that have me struggle to relate or develop any sympathy for some of the characters. For starters, though I like Nicholas and believe he is a crucial character, the first time he sees Etta he has this overwhelming urge to protect her. Even as he was pulling her out of the ocean, he was "willing" her not to die. And as the surgeon was resuscitating Etta, Nicholas remarks on how he didn't like the way the other men aboard the ship were observing her. This is escalated further, during the crew dinner. Both Nicholas and Etta make rash decisions, jump to one another's defense and feel protective over someone they only just met. In addition, this plot-line was fairly predictable, within moments of meeting Nicholas, the readers know that Etta and Nicholas will fall "in love."
However, personally, I found that the romance happened pretty quickly--they have only known one another for a few weeks and both Etta and Nicholas are trying figure out their "forever" plan. Not to mention the "love scene" in Bhutan, it escalated quickly-- going from 0 to 60 in just a few minutes. Now don't get me wrong, I love a great romance plot and I loved the little moments they shared together, like when they were in the London tunnel during the bombing or in Paris after Nicholas thought he saw his mother. But in some instances the romance felt out of place-- like Etta should really be more focused on saving her mother's life, instead of furthering a relationship with a potential boyfriend (who by the way is 240 years older than her).
Also, at times Etta seems quite independent, self-sufficient and strong. But more often then not, Nicholas is fulfilling the role of her protector and bodyguard, but also the person piecing the clues together. At those moments, it was frustrating to read because I was trying figure out what Etta's role was and why she has relinquished so much control. Especially when Rose's clues were targeted to Etta's life and experiences.
Lastly, I found several points that were similar to the "Ruby Red" trilogy. Both stories have the heroin on a type of scavenger hunt and both focus on a rare device that aids in time travel, as well as having one leader pulling the strings, while existing in the past. Not to mention, both stories utilize a biological gene, which allows a select few individuals to travel through time. Though there are similarities between the stories, there a quite of few differences. I liked how Bracken combined all of the elements and gave Etta a unique perspective. Bracken's idea of a "blank slat" was creative, and it explained (to some degree) as to, why Rose did not tell Etta about the time-travelling world. Also, Bracken's use of music was an interesting way in connecting Etta's passion and her destiny. I also, enjoyed how the story was told from both Nicholas and Etta's points of views. It gave readers a little more back-story and history to the time-travelling world.
Also, I do feel that because I did read the "Ruby Red" trilogy, I might be a bit critical of "Passenger." However I want to reiterate, that I did enjoy "Passenger" quite a bit. I found the origin of each families' lineage interesting, and I liked how there are Guardians-- like Alice, or members of each family throughout history (time and space) that guide and protect the travelers. I think these aspects are clever and unique, which makes "Passenger" a different type of time-travelling story. I am also, looking forward to see how the next book unfolds.
I am eager to see what Nicholas' next steps are after the cliffhanger and how Sophia will fit in with his plan. I'm really hoping that Rose kindof steps up, in the next book. Rose's character bothered me, I felt that Rose was only interested in Etta when it benefited her. And I'd like to see how Etta and Rose's relationship either grows or fizzles, because of the disclosure of secrets-- like who is Etta's father or will Rose come clean about Alice.
But my biggest hope for the second book, is to see more of Alice. I love the Alice character (both the old and young version), Alice is such an important person in Etta's life, and I like to see how Alice will fit into the next story. Maybe there could be some Nicholas/Alice scenes? Since they are the two people the care about Etta the most, maybe they could work together to figure out how to find her.
I liked how "Passenger" left off on a cliffhanger, it makes me excited to read what happens next. I do have some questions, but I think that's only normal. Hopefully we'll have those answers in the second novel (though I anticipate once one question is answered, there will be a dozen more new questions). I'm eager to see where Etta ended up, if Nicholas will find her, and how the events in "Passenger" effected or changed the future/ Etta's present.
What do you think? Where would you like to go, if you could travel throughout time? What are you hoping to see in the next book? Let me know, I'd love to hear your thoughts!
For now, I say good night and hope that the my random ramblings have peeked your inner bookworm.
~BL
Hello to all of you lovelies! As a fan of a wide variety of novels, I enjoy reading books with creative perspectives and different point of views, as well as interesting story lines. A lot of the time, this comes from novels revolving around situations that drive character development. I try to find books with compelling characters, social satire and story evolution. 
